◀ ip

• Year 1

  • Presuppositionalism vs. Causality
  • John Frame vs. the Human Thinker
  • Bahnsen's Poof
  • Christianity vs. Objective Morality
  • The Cartoon Universe of Theism
  • Thus Saith the Lord and His Spokesmen: Shut Down Thy Mind!
  • Paul's Empty Sling
  • The "God's Good Pleasure" Principle and the Cartoon Universe Premise
  • Omnipotence and Sovereignty in the Cartoon Universe
  • Do I Borrow My Morality from the Christian Worldview?
  • Putting Paul's TAG to the Geusha Test
  • From the Horse's Mouth: Apologists
  • Paul's Argument from Desperation
  • Difficulty Keeping the Party Line Straight
  • The Real Genesis Account
  • Five Hundred Anonymous Witnesses
  • I Don't Believe It
  • Arbitrary Presupposition vs. Reasoned Conclusion
  • Cooking with Gene's Abritrary Presuppositions
  • Is Man "Created in the Image of God"?
  • No "Might Be" About It: I AM an Atheist
  • Is Human Experience Evidence of the Christian God?
  • Can Reformed Christians Count?
  • Is the Assumption of the Christian God Axiomatic?
  • Only Two Worldviews?
  • Christianity as the Worship of Self-Contradiction
  • Christ Jesus: Still a Jumble of Contradictions
  • Is the Contrary to Christianity Truly Impossible?
  • Reckless Apologetic Presumptuousness
  • Probing Mr. Manata's Poor Understanding of the Axioms
  • Tape-Loop Apologetics
  • What Happened to Paul?
  • Bahnsen's Three Charges of Prejudice
  • Bahnsen's Poof Revisited
  • With Minds of Children
  • Dear Sal
  • Presuppositionalism and the Argument from Ignorance
  • In the Beginning...
  • Will the Real TAG Please Stand Up?
  • Rational Morality vs. Presuppositional Apologetics
  • CalvinDude's Defense of Christianity's Moral Bankruptcy
  • Confessions of a Vantillian Subjectivist
• Year 2

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year One
  • Responding to Pavielle
  • Hitler vs. Mother Theresa: Antithesis or Symbiosis?
  • Manata’s Powers of Flawgic
  • Christian Insecurity: A Case Study
  • Basic Contra-Theism
  • Jason and the Halluci-Nots
  • Did the Author of I Peter See the Risen Jesus of the Gospels?
  • Manata Overboard: Adrift and Without a Paddle
  • Seeing Through the Hays
  • Hays on the Cartoon Universe Premise of Theism
  • Steve’s Hays-ty Reaction to the Cartoon Universe Premise of His
  • The Strength’s of the Cartoon Universe Analogy
  • Steve’s Persisting Haysiness
  • A Response to Paul
  • Carr vs. Cole
  • See, I told you so!
  • Metaphysical Subjectivism and Christianity’s Cartoon Universe, Pt.
  • Metaphysical Subjectivism and Christianity’s Cartoon Universe, Pt.
  • A.S.A. Jones on the Age-Old Rock Question
  • Slam Dunk!
  • Theism and Its Piggyback Starting Point
  • Responding to Chris
  • Christianity: The Imaginary Friend’s Network
  • Frame’s Summary of Van Til’s OMA
  • Gods and Square Circles
  • Is the Expression ‘Invisible Magic Being’ “Pejorative”?
  • Those Delicate Christian Sensibilities
  • “Do unto others...”
  • The Axioms and the Primacy of Existence
  • Wishing and the Christian Deity
  • Chronic Manatism: Boy Wonder and His Invisible Magic Being
  • Paulianna Apologetics
  • Reveling in Reversals
  • Apologetic Evasion Overload
  • Theism and Subjective Metaphysics
  • Paul’s “Necessary Propositions”
  • Faith as Belief Without Understanding
  • The Ominous Parallels Between Presuppositionalism and Drug
  • Exapologist’s Message to Non-Theists
  • Common Ground Part 1: What Do Believers and Non-Believers Have in
  • Common Ground Part 2: The Standard of Evaluation
  • Common Ground Part 3: Metaphysics
  • Common Ground Part 4: Epistemology
  • Common Ground Part 5: Ethics
  • Common Ground Part 6: Cooperation
  • Common Ground Part 7: Consequences of Division
  • Inerrancy... Christian Style
• Year 3

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year 2
  • Virginia Tech
  • Christian Reaction to Virginia Tech
  • Would an Omniscient Mind Have Knowledge in Conceptual Form?
  • Pike on Concepts and Omniscience
  • Pike’s Pique
  • More Piqued Pike
  • Jet’s Flimsy Denials
  • Answering Ecualegacy, Pt. 1
  • Answering Ecualegacy, Pt. 2
  • Answering Ecualegacy, Pt. 3
  • Answering Ecualegacy, Pt. 4
  • A Succinct Summary of My Worldview
  • The Moral Uselessness of the 10 Commandments
  • The Problem of Saul
  • The Role of Imagination in Christian God-Belief
  • The Presuppositionalist View of Man’s Consciousness
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 1: Introduction
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 2: “The Reproach of of the Transcendent”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 3: “Defining the Metaphysical”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 4: “Fundamental Distinctions”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 5: “A Comprehensive Metaphysic”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 6: “The Christian Metaphysic”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 7: “Distinguishing Appearance from Reality”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 8: “Ultimate Questions”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 9: “Suprasensible Reality”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 10: “Pure Motives?”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 11: “The Case Against Metaphysics”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 12: “Logical Positivism”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 13: “Double Standards and Begging the Question”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 14: “Philosophical Self-Deception”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 15: “Further Difficulties”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 16: “No Predictability”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 17: “Naturalism versus Supernaturalism as Worldviews”
  • Bahnsen on “Knowing the Supernatural” Part 18: Final Assessment and Conclusion
  • Roadmap to Bahnsen on the Supernatural
  • Singhing the Greg Bahnsen Blues
  • Lord Oda on Faith
  • Lord Oda’s “Problem with Pain”
  • D. James Kennedy’s Impotent Jesus
  • My Chat with a Presuppositionalist
  • Van Til vs. Bahnsen
  • A Response to Vytautas
  • The Imaginative Basis of Vytautas’ God-Belief, Part 1
  • The Imaginative Basis of Vytautas’ God-Belief, Part 2
  • The Imaginative Basis of Vytautas’ God-Belief, Part 3
  • The Imaginative Basis of Vytautas’ God-Belief, Part 4
  • The Imaginative Basis of Vytautas’ God-Belief, Part 5
  • Presuppositionalism and the Evasion of the Burden of Proof, Part
  • Presuppositionalism and the Evasion of the Burden of Proof, Part
  • Presuppositionalism and the Evasion of the Burden of Proof, Part
  • Quixie on Witherington on Doherty
• Year 4

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Three
  • The Double Whammy
  • God the Father: A Father of Love?
  • Faith as Hope in the Imaginary
  • Stolen Concepts and Intellectual Parasitism
  • Dodging the Subject-Object Relationship
  • Before the Beginning: The Problem of Divine Lonesomeness
  • [SIC]
  • Is I Corinthians 15:3-8 'Too Early' to Be Legend?
  • In Response to David on I Corinthians 15:3-8
  • Another Response to David, Part 1: The Charge of Strawman
  • Another Response to David, Part 2: The Witness of Paul
  • Another Response to David, Part 3: The Usual Pagan Suspects
  • Another Response to David, Part 4: Paul, Q and Groping
  • Another Response to David, Part 5: Paul's Knowledge of Jesus
  • Another Response to David, Part 6: Signs of the Legend
  • Another Response to David, Part 7: The Anatomy of Legend and the
  • Geisler-Turek Reflux
  • Paul's Ignorance of the Earthly Jesus, Part 1: Prologue and
  • Paul's Ignorance of the Earthly Jesus, Part 2: Claims 1-7
  • Paul's Ignorance of the Earthly Jesus, Part 3: Claims 8-14
  • A Reply to Tennant on Theistic Foundationalism vs. the Objectivist
  • Rival Philosophies of Fact
  • Thoughts on Recent Comments by Vytautas
  • Could the Christian God Be Rational?
  • The Inherent Subjectivism of God-belief
  • Do Objectivists Try to “Define God Out of Existence”?
  • Off to Asia!
  • Was Adam Created Perfect?
  • Pass the Pepto Baptismal: The “Hell Being Community” at Wat Phai
  • Legends, Lüdemann, and Inductive Inference
  • A Response to Josh Ratliff on the “Creed” in I Corinthians 15
• Year 5

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Four
  • Was Jesus a Great Moral Teacher?
  • Three Questions on the Resurrection
  • Q and A on Atheism
  • Ultimate Questions
  • Non-Cognitivism or Metaphysical Primacy: What’s the Better
  • The “Necessary Being” Versus “Contingent Being” Argument
  • Theistic Misuse of the Concepts of Meaning, Value and Purpose
  • Demystifying Universality
  • Is the “immaterial” Actually Imaginary?
  • Is Existence Merely an Attribute?
  • Does Logic Presuppose the Christian God? Part I: Examining the
  • Does Logic Presuppose the Christian God? Part II: Reasons Why
  • Does Logic Presuppose the Christian God? Part II: Reasons Why
  • Does Logic Presuppose the Christian God? Part II: Reasons Why
  • Does Logic Presuppose the Christian God? Part II: Reasons Why
  • The Concept of “Chance”: Right and Wrong Uses
  • Chris Bolt on the Conditions of Knowledge
  • A Rejoinder to Chris Bolt
  • RazorsKiss on the Christian God as the Basis of Knowledge - Part
  • RazorsKiss on the Christian God as the Basis of Knowledge - Part
  • RazorsKiss on the Christian God as the Basis of Knowledge – Part
  • RazorsKiss on the Christian God as the Basis of Knowledge – Part
  • RazorsKiss on the Christian God as the Basis of Knowledge – Part
  • RazorsKiss on the Christian God as the Basis of Knowledge – Part
  • RazorsKiss on the Christian God as the Basis of Knowledge – Part
  • RazorsKiss on the Christian God as the Basis of Knowledge – Part
  • RazorsKiss on the Christian God as the Basis of Knowledge – Part
  • Response to Madmax
  • Chris Bolt’s Questions
  • Bolt’s Loose Screws
  • Bolt’s Leaking Boat
  • Can the Water in My Drinking Glass Turn into Merlot?
  • Natural Revelation: Direct Apprehension or Inference?
  • Chris Bolt on Hume and Induction
  • Bolt on Evidence and the Need to Take a Claim Seriously
  • Kreeft on the Design Argument
  • The Argument from Predication
  • Are Non-Christians Unable to “Account for” Their Counting?
  • How Theism Violates the Primacy of Existence
  • The Uniformity of Nature
  • Humean Causality and Presuppositionalism
  • Causality as a Necessary Relationship
  • John Robbins and the Foreclosure of His Critique of Objectivism
  • Extra! Extra! Read all about it! Irrefutable Evidence that Christianity is True!
  • Bolt’s Pile of Knapp, Pt. 1
  • Bolt’s Pile of Knapp, Pt. 2
  • Bolt’s Pile of Knapp, Pt. 3
  • Bolt’s Pile of Knapp, Pt. 4
  • Bolt’s Pile of Knapp, Pt. 5
• Year 6

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Five
  • If Knowledge Then Non-Theism
  • The Imaginative Nature of Christian Theism
  • My Suppressed Comment Regarding TAG on Choosing Hats
  • TAG: Precariously Straddling the Horns of a Nasty Dilemma
  • Is Atheism Inherently Arrogant?
  • Answering Hutchinson’s Critique of Objectivism
  • A Response to David Smart on Arrogance
  • Was I Ever a Presuppositionalist Myself?
  • The Biological Nature of Consciousness
  • The Storybook Worldview
  • Is the Christian God’s Existence “Self-Evident”?
  • Nocterro’s Anti-Objectivist Pseudo-Terrorism
  • A Critique of Sye Ten Bruggencate’s www.proofthatgodexists.org
  • My Squabble with Andrew
  • A Reply to Andrew Louis
  • Another Reply to Andrew Louis
  • Andrew Louis’ Persisting Confusions
  • Rick Warden’s Critique of Objectivism
  • Some Thoughts on Presuppositionalism and the Problem of Evil
  • A Knock at the Door
  • Was Ayn Rand “Dead Wrong”?
  • Does the Double Slit Experiment Refute the Primacy of Existence?
  • Thoughts on Gallup’s Religious Wellbeing Polls
  • On “Justifying” the “Inductive Principle”
• Year 7

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Six
  • Imagine There’s a Heaven
  • The Argument from the Unity of Knowledge
  • Considering Tony’s Offerings
  • A Proof that the Christian God Does Not Exist
  • Nide’s Snide
  • Presuppositionalism vs. Objectivism: How Objectivism Prevails
  • Five Years and Still Waiting…
  • STB: One Year and Still Waiting…
  • Answering Nide’s Questions about the Uniformity of Nature
  • Strange Bedfellows?
  • George H. Smith’s “Atheism: The Case Against God” – Online – Free
  • Has the Primacy of Existence Been Refuted?
  • A Reply to Dustin Seger’s Dismantled Blog Entry on Objectivism
  • Cognitive Reliability vs. Supernatural Deception
  • Christianity’s Sanction of Evil
  • Christianity’s Psychological Price Tag
  • Some Thoughts on the “Sensus Divinitatis”
  • A Reply to Michael: Further Thoughts on the Issue of Supernatural
  • Are the Laws of Logic “Thoughts” of the Christian God?
  • Reaction to My Critique of Anderson and Welty’s “The Lord of
  • Nide’s 15
  • Can a Worldview “Provide” the “Preconditions of Intelligibility”?
  • Can a Worldview “Provide” the “Preconditions of Intelligibility”?
  • Can a Worldview “Provide” the “Preconditions of Intelligibility”?
  • The Self-Attesting Absurdity of the Christian Worldview
• Year 8

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Seven
  • Answering Dustin Segers’ Presuppositionalism, Part I: Intro and
  • Answering Dustin Segers’ Presuppositionalism, Part II: The Nature
  • Answering Dustin Segers’ Presuppositionalism, Part IIIa: The
  • Answering Dustin Segers’ Presuppositionalism, Part IIIb: The
  • Answering Dustin Segers’ Presuppositionalism, Part IVa: Objective
  • Answering Dustin Segers’ Presuppositionalism, Part IVb:
  • Greg Bahnsen on the Problem of Evil
  • Christian Anti-Morality: A Response to Nide
  • In Shambles: Nide's Crumbling Worldview
  • Presuppositionalism’s Finest?
  • Craig Keener on Miracles
  • Chris Bolt vs. the Evils of Demanding Evidence in Support of Truth
  • Is Anyone Truly a Christian?
  • STB: Two Years and Counting
  • Answers to “50 Important Philosophical Questions”
  • Christianity vs. Happiness
  • Hell is for Believers
  • Is Math Christian?
  • My Discussion with Michael Rawlings
  • Michael David Rawlings and the Primacy of a Bad Attitude
  • Rawlings' Bawlings
  • Prayson Daniel vs. the Imaginative Nature of Christian Theism
  • Debate between Objectivist Andrew Bernstein and Dinesh D’Souza Now on YouTube
  • A Case in Point, Part I
  • A Case in Point, Part II
• Year 9

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Eight
  • On the Validity of the Senses
  • A Lesson on Presuppositional Gimmickry
  • Dear Apologist: Can You Demonstrate that You’re the Real McCoy?
  • Some Thoughts on Pope Francis’ Recent Condemnation of Capitalism
  • Klouda-ing the Issue
  • TAG Defeated in One Fell Swoop
  • John Frame’s Empty-Handed Epistemology
  • Sye Ten Bruggencate vs. the Absolute Laws of Logic
  • Presuppositionalist Pseudolosophy
  • Hodge’s Hedgings
  • STB: Three Years and Counting
  • Subjectivism in Hodge’s View of Reality and Knowledge
  • My August Comments to B.C. Hodge
  • The Primacy of the Inner over the Outer
  • Mike Licona Says: “I want it to be true”
  • Behold How the Holy Ones Speak
  • Reason vs. Faith
  • Twerking for Jesus
  • An Examination of the Ontological Argument
  • The Moral Code of Life
  • A Reply to Stefan on Induction and Deduction
  • For Jonathan
  • Examining Stefan’s Presuppositionalism
  • Rick Warden’s Ill-Fated Effort to Refute My Argument from Metaphysical Primacy
  • Three Steps Proving that Theism Cannot Be True
  • The Vindication of My Argument Against Theism from Rick Warden's Ill-fated Maneuvers
  • Warden’s “Addenda” regarding the Nature of Truth
  • Spinning Out of Orbit: Rick Warden Lost in the Outer Limits
  • Warden’s Persisting Failure to Integrate
  • A Reply to Matthias on Imagination and Its Role in Theism
  • A Reply to Matthias on Philosophical Starting Points
  • A Reply to Matthias on Holy Inference vs. Reason: How Do We Know
  • A Reply to Matthias on Objective Knowledge vs. the Subjectivism of
  • A Reply to Matthias on “Analogous Knowledge”
  • A Reply to Matthias on Subjectivism and the Believer
  • At a Loss for Words: Rick Warden’s Latest Comment
  • The Futility of the Apologetic Appeal to “Revelation”
  • The Moral Implications of Belief in an Afterlife
  • Is Jason Lisle Epistemologically Self-Conscious?
  • Vince’s Three Unpublished Comments to Rick Warden’s Blog
  • Answering Jason Lisle on the Reliability of the Senses
  • Jason Lisle on Logic
  • On Romans 1:20-21
  • Jason Lisle on Axioms
  • I Reject Christianity Because It’s Not True, Part I
  • I Reject Christianity Because It’s Not True, Part II
  • I Reject Christianity Because It’s Not True, Part III
  • I Reject Christianity Because It’s Not True, Part IV
  • A Logical God?
• Year 10

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Nine
  • On the Claim to Have Experienced “the Supernatural”
  • A Reply to Dave McPhillips on Bahnsen’s Treatment of the Problem
  • Presuppositionalism, Circular Argument, and Oliphant’s Defense
  • Is the Concept of Evidence Itself Evidence that God Exists?
  • Fumbling at the First Down
  • How Bahnsen Gives Away the Farm in His Debate with Gordon Stein
  • Shining a Bright Light into Dave’s Dark Cave
  • Dawson’s Razor
  • Dave’s McPresuppositions, Part I
  • Dave’s McPresuppositions, Part II
  • Dave’s McPresuppositions, Part III
  • Dave’s McPresuppositions, Part VI
  • Dave’s McPresuppositions, Part V
  • A Response to Christian James
  • Does Religion Dull One’s Ability to Distinguish between Fact and
  • STB: Four Years and Counting
  • What Alternative Do “Apostates” Have after Leaving
  • Deriving “Ought” from Dirt
  • ”Atheism Can’t Ground Objective Morality”?
  • Petersen’s Failed Attempts to Refute Leonard Peikoff: Preamble
  • Petersen’s Failed Attempts to Refute Leonard Peikoff: Objection
  • Petersen’s Failed Attempts to Refute Leonard Peikoff: Objection
  • Petersen’s Failed Attempts to Refute Leonard Peikoff: Objection
  • Petersen’s Failed Attempts to Refute Leonard Peikoff: Objection 4
  • “Christian Epistemology”: The Blind Leading the Blind
  • Jason Petersen's Abysmal Ignorance of Concepts
  • Jason Petersen’s “Epistemology”
  • Presuppositionalism, Atheism, and Confusion over the Primacy of
  • The Primacy of Existence vs. the Prior Certainty of
  • Jason Petersen on the Fallacy of Pure Self-Reference
  • Glossary of Terms
  • Jason Petersen on Objectivism and the Laws of Logic
  • Fringe Outliers or Pioneering Trailblazers?
  • Petersen vs. the Universe
  • Lennox’s 10, Part I
  • Lennox’s 10, Part II
  • Lennox’s 10, Part III
  • Lennox’s 10, Part IV
  • Lennox’s 10, Part V
  • Craig’s Eight Arguments for God, Part I: Introduction
  • Craig’s Eight Arguments for God, Part II: “God is the best
  • Craig’s Eight Arguments for God, Part III: “God is the best
  • Craig’s Eight Arguments for God, Part IV: “God is the best
  • Craig’s Eight Arguments for God, Part V: “God is the best
  • Craig’s Eight Arguments for God, Part VI: “God is the best
  • Craig’s Eight Arguments for God, Part VII: “God is the best
  • Craig’s Eight Arguments for God, Part VIII: “The very possibility
  • Craig’s Eight Arguments for God, Part IX: “God can be personally
  • The Ending of the Gospel of Mark
• Year 11

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Ten
  • Natural Born Atheists
  • Does Atheism Truly Lead to Nihilism?
  • Does Atheism Truly “render good and evil nebulous”?
  • From the Horse's Mouth... Again!
  • Changing Your Views
  • Being Prepared for Encounters with Evangelists
  • Believer’s Remorse
  • The Tragedy that is Christian Morality
  • The Hideous Rigors of Christian Salvation Doubt
  • ”…it’s easy to imagine all the saved in heaven…”
  • Fishing with a Chick Track
  • Walking on Water vs. Reality
  • Is the Resurrection Story “too improbable” to Believe?
  • W.L. Craig, the Resurrection, and the Complaint of
  • The Moral Virtues of Objectivism
  • William Lane Craig Versus Objective Morality
  • Ten Ways Faith Opposes Reason
  • G.A. Wells’ “Guidelines for Hostile Writing”
  • Creationism, the Universe, and Imagination
  • ”Don’t you dare disbelieve!”
• Year 12

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Eleven
  • The “Mistakes of Apostates”
  • Frame vs. Poythress on the Notion of ‘Chance’
  • ”I’ll pray for you”
  • Prayer Wishes and Paranoia
  • Normativity and the Primacy of Existence
  • Does One Need Evidence to Be an Atheist?
  • Exchange with a Presuppositionalist
  • Here we go again…
  • Theism and Thumb-sucking
  • Hearing Voices in Your Head
  • More on Hearing Voices in His Head
• Year 13

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Twelve
  • Sye’s Fixation with “Insane” People
  • Anderson on the Lowder-Turek Debate
  • Andy Bannister on Atheism
  • Do Gardens Imply the Existence of Invisible Magic Beings?
  • D’oh!
  • Christian Hope
  • Do Atheists Face a Dilemma Inherent in Atheism?
  • ”Where did morality come from?”
  • ”What would convince you?”
  • Is the Christian God a “Necessary Being”?
  • Does Following the Evidence Lead One Over a Cliff?
• Year 14

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Thirteen
  • Existence and Perception
  • Edward Feser on Ayn Rand
  • The Futility of Theodicy
  • The Disgruntled Apologist
  • The Burden of Proof
  • Parsing the Haysian Square-Circle
  • Is Human life really “futile” without a god?
  • Faith and Imagining
  • Are the Gospel Crucifixion Scenes Eyewitness Accounts?
  • The Metaphysics of Wishing
  • Steve Hays’ Invisible Friend
  • The Speeches in Acts: History or Legend?
• Year 15

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Fourteen
  • Wilson’s Fixation on Fizzing
  • More on Wilson’s Fizzing about Fizzing
  • Does Objectivism Deny the Reality of Change?
  • The Agony of Agnosticism, or: Why Not Mature Thoughtfulness?
  • Pardon My Skepticism…
  • Shrugging off Mysticism
  • Hallomeanie!
  • ”He is found in our hearts”
  • Initial Questions for Anderson’s “Why Should I Believe
  • Preliminary Worldview Considerations before Anderson’s WSIBC
  • WSIBC: “Competing Worldviews”
  • WSIBC: Divine Voices and Failed Arguments
  • WSIBC: “God and Existence” – Part 1: “The Question”
  • WSIBC: “God and Existence” – Part 2: Contingency Desperation
  • WSIBC: “God and Values”
  • WSIBC: “God and Morality”
  • WSIBC: “God and Reason”
• Year 16

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Fifteen
  • WSIBC: “God and Mind”
  • WSIBC: “God and Science”
  • WSIBC: Presup Enters Rehab
  • Reader Email Backlog
  • WSIBC Jump Page
  • My Refutation of STB: Ten Years On
  • Presuppositionalism and Induction
  • Presuppositionalism and Induction: Apologists Courting Hume
  • Presuppositionalism and Induction: Exhuming Hume
  • Presuppositionalism and Induction: The Humean Condition
  • Presuppositionalism and Induction: Thoughts on the Uniformity of
  • Anderson versus Materialism
• Year 17

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Sixteen
  • “Faith in the reasoning process”
  • Answering the Epistemologist
  • Anderson versus Materialism, Part II: The Problem of Personal Identity over Time
  • Gotquestions.org's Article on TAG
  • David Wood, Star Trek, and the Inevitable Persistence of Religion
  • Christianity and Socialism
  • "He walked among us"
  • The Specter of Antithesis
  • Preliminary Thoughts on Van Til’s “Argument from Unity of Knowledge”
  • An Examination of Van Til’s “Argument from the Unity of Knowledge”
  • An Examination of Van Til’s “Argument from the Uniformity of Nature”
• Year 18

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Seventeen
  • Some Thoughts in Response to Anderson’s Argument on Propositions
  • Apparently I don't have the right...
  • Same Old Song and Dance: Anderson on Induction... again
  • Stovetop Realizations
  • TAG and the Appeal to Magic
  • Why Do Apologists Raise the Problem of Induction in Debate?
  • Is Creation Possible?
  • Evolution and the Persistence of Religion
  • On the Kalam Cosmological Argument
  • Buried Signposts
  • Epistemology or Methodological Amnesia?
  • TAG in Two Steps
• Year 19

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Eighteen
  • TASC: The Transcendental Argument for Square-Circles
  • Bahnsen's Poof Revisited... Again
  • Frank Turek vs. the Laws of Nature
  • What are the odds..?
  • What are the odds..?
  • Do the Senses “Distort”?
  • Jason Lisle on Sensory Experience and Epistemology
  • Vistor Questions on Jeff Durbin and Formal Debates with Apologists
  • Anderson’s Anti-Epistemological Argument Against Naturalism
  • Bahnsen’s “tremendous philosophical mistake”
  • Answering Objections to my ‘Horse’s Mouth’ Collection
  • Concepts and Induction
  • Is the Axiom of Existence “Ambiguous”? A Reply to Eli Ayala
  • Peikoff on the Invulnerability of the Axioms
• Year 20

  • Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Year Nineteen
  • Why are you an atheist?